In a totally natural situation,
several species of animals utilize the plants in an ecosystem.
Environmental factors (soils, climate and weather, fire, etc.)
will have the most impact on what kind of plants grow in a
certain area, but the grazing preferences of livestock and
wildlife also have a strong influence. If only one species of
grazer is present, the plant community changes as preferred
forage is heavily utilized and gives way to less desired plants
that have no grazing pressure.
Single species grazing ultimately has a negative impact on
the plant composition of grazing land. For instance, after
numerous years of cattle-only grazing, the preferred grass
species decline and the less preferred grasses, forbs and browse
increase. By contrast, using multiple species of livestock helps
spread grazing pressures across a wider variety of plants,
reducing the chance for certain plants to develop a competitive
edge over others.
Some range managers feel that the increasing problem of
invasive weeds on public lands is a direct result of declining
sheep numbers during the past several decades. Some of the worst
weeds today on cattle ranges (spotted knapweed, leafy spurge,
yellow star thistle, etc.) are readily eaten by sheep and goats.
Adding another species of livestock to a cattle operation can
have some definite benefits. Whether the advantages outweigh the
disadvantages may depend upon your own situation and purposes,
climate and forage growth, etc. Some of the advantages include
more efficient use of pasture plants and more weed control
(since different species of livestock prefer different plants),
control of brush when browsers are included in the species mix,
more parasite control (since most species of internal parasite
are host specific and cannot complete their life cycle in the
wrong animal), and more income per acre if you can accommodate
more animals on your pastures. Some of the disadvantages include
possibilities of disease transmission from one species to
another under certain conditions, and the need for more
facilities, labor and management in some situations.
Some people who raise horses have discovered the advantages
of using cattle rotationally with their horses. With horses
alone, even in a good rotational pasture management system, you
end up with tall patches of grass that are never grazed. The
horses keep returning to their favorite grasses and overgraze
them, leaving other plants untouched. Ungrazed weeds go to seed
and spread over more of the pasture unless you mow those areas
or graze them with other livestock, to make sure weeds or
thistle patches don’t take over the field.
Sheep or goats do a better job of utilizing some “weeds” than
cattle can. “If you use multi-species grazing, there will be
some animals—whether cattle, sheep or goats, that would eat
those plants,” says Dr. Burt Staniar, Pennsylvania State
University. Then they won’t go to seed and may eventually die
out because most of them are annuals or biennials. This type of
weed control is more effective, efficient and
environmentally-friendly than use of herbicides.
Parasites
The same is true for parasite control. “Generally you have
different parasites in different species. They can’t mature in
the wrong host. You can break the life cycle of most parasites
by using multi-species grazing,” says Staniar. This works best
if you use different species rotationally and separately. When
cattle worm eggs hatch, for instance, and the larvae move onto
grass plants to be eaten, if eaten by a sheep those larvae won’t
survive to mature and lay more eggs. And when the plant regrows
after being eaten by one species, the parasites are no longer on
that plant and it is safer for the other species to eat.
Cattle can act as “vacuum cleaners” to ingest sheep worm
larva, and vice versa, when these species follow each other in a
grazing rotation system. This can be a good companion strategy
to deworming, since many common parasites are becoming resistant
to drugs. Goats and sheep share some parasites, however, and
grazing them together does not improve parasite control. Yet
goats will stay relatively free of internal parasites, if given
adequate room with enough browsing. Worm eggs pass through the
animal in manure, and hatching larvae only travel a short
distance up the blades of grass. Goats will only become heavily
infected with parasites if forced to graze at ground level.
Cattle, sheep and horses prefer not to eat the plants next to
their own manure (and perhaps this is nature’s way to try to
minimize parasite load) and always leave some forage ungrazed
unless they are short on food. They will, however, eat near
other species’ manure. Thus multi-species grazing results in
more uniform use of forage—increasing total pasture productivity
and carrying capacity.
Different Grazing Habits
- Cattle and sheep have traditionally been used together and
more completely utilize a pasture than either species alone,
since cattle tend to prefer grass and some legumes while sheep
prefer legumes--then forbs and grass. Sheep will eat some weeds
that cattle won’t. Cattle eat some of the taller, more mature
plants that sheep don’t like. Due to different preferences they
make better use of the entire pasture.
When goats are added to the mix, or used with cattle, there
is more diverse use of plants since goats prefer forbs and
brush, then grass, before they’ll touch legumes. They prefer
browsing to grazing. Goats will eat brush as high as they can
reach, standing on their hind legs to trim back willows and
other woody invaders of pastureland. Goats are typically
top-down grazers; they eat the high brush before grazing down to
soil level, and will also graze along fencelines before grazing
the center of a pasture. They never overuse the grass plants. As
a rule of thumb, goats eat highest, cattle eat at intermediate
level, sheep graze closer (having smaller mouths), and horses
can nip plants right down to the ground—having the advantage of
top and bottom incisors.
Goats are now used in many geographic regions for brush and
weed control. They can be very beneficial in helping reclaim
pastureland that has gone to brush and/or weeds. In some
instances ranchers fence them onto areas of pasture that need
brush/weed reduction. On range allotments, herds of goats are
sometimes kept on specific areas by herders.
As stated by Kevin Sedivec, North Dakota State University
Rangeland Management Specialist, cattle eat mostly grass while
sheep and goats eat weeds and forbs. Cattle diets are typically
70 percent grass. Goat diets are usually about 60 percent browse
(bushes and trees). Sheep diets average about 50 percent grass,
30 percent forbs and 20 percent browse.
Goats eat high off the ground, while sheep and cattle eat
low. Goats and sheep do well on plants that cattle won’t touch,
turning “waste” plants into meat and milk. In Sedivec’s area of
North Dakota, ranchers can add one sheep or 1.5 goats to most
pastures without adjusting cattle numbers. If undesirable plants
like leafy spurge make up more than 40 percent of a pasture, he
says you can add 2 sheep per cow or 2 to 2.5 goats per cow.
The biggest advantage of multi-species grazing is in large
unimproved pastures like rangeland, rather than in a lush
improved, cultivated pasture planted to tame grasses. The
stocking rates of any species in a multi-species mix will depend
on the pasture or rangeland having a variety of plants—grass,
forbs, brush. If pastures are a monoculture of tame grass
plants, the animals would all be competing for the same forage.
In rough country, sheep and goats can be compatible with
cattle to provide greater utilization of forage. Sheep and goats
tend to use steeper, rockier land where cattle generally prefer
not to go. Multi-species grazing on certain pastures can
increase livestock production by 25 percent, on average, as
shown in numerous trials. Compared with cattle-only grazing,
sheep and cattle together have been shown to increase production
per unit area by 10 to 53 percent, depending on the situation.
Competition for forage is always greater for animals of the
same species, as opposed to animals of different species.
Grazing pressure is therefore lower, and individual animal
performance higher, at the same stocking rates under
multi-species grazing management than single-species grazing.
Studies have shown that sheep grazed in combination with cattle
gained 12 to 126 percent more (an average of 30 percent more,
across the board) than sheep grazed alone. Cattle grazed with
sheep had gains of up to 21 percent above cattle-only grazing.
The key to success, however, is to make sure total stocking
rate does not exceed carrying capacity of the pastureland. A
general rule of thumb is that on moderately stocked pastures,
one ewe can be added for each cow without adversely affecting
cattle performance or pasture health/condition. In pastures with
large amounts of brush or weeds that goats will eat, the number
of goats that can be added to a cattle pasture may be much
higher.
Some ranchers who utilize Angora goats on rangeland produce
extra income with meat and mohair from the goats. In some
geographic regions goat meat can be very profitable in a niche
market, to sell to the ethnic trade during times of year that
correspond with the holidays of different cultures. There are a
number of cultures that traditionally eat sheep and/or goats
rather than beef.
Management Concerns
Adding another species or two in a cattle operation requires
some extra labor and expense, such as more secure fencing to
contain sheep or goats. In many instances you can simply add an
electric wire. Barbed-wire fences can be augmented by adding
offset electric wire or a few extra strands of barbed-wire. You
also need to make sure water troughs are low enough for sheep to
drink, or add some stepping blocks around the troughs so the
animals can climb up higher.
In large pastures or rangeland, problems of species
interaction or bullying (cattle not letting the sheep or goats
drink at a trough, or a ram chasing cows away) are minimized. In
smaller pastures this can be a problem. These challenges can be
overcome by rotating one species through a pasture system ahead
of the other (keeping the animals separate) or putting creep
fencing or gates around part of the watering area to allow the
smaller animals to enter.
If you don’t want to own the sheep or goats, or don’t want the
labor involved in lambing or kidding, another option is to lease
pasture to someone who has sheep or goats—they come in graze,
then take the animals home again.
One caution: if sheep are grazing with cattle, be careful to
not use a mineral mix that contains copper. Levels of copper
found in commercial mineral mixes for cattle are too high for
sheep and can be toxic. If you plan to add another species to
your cattle operation, do your homework. It also pays to start
small and learn from experience as you go. It takes more
management, but can be a great benefit to your land and pastures
in the long run, and may add to your income if you do it right.
Sidebar
WEEDS CAN BE WELL UTILIZED BY GOATS AND SHEEP
By definition, a weed is a plant growing in a setting in which
it is considered undesirable. For pasture purposes, there are
many plants that are undesirable because they are not well
utilized by cattle. This is where goats can be the
heroes—converting weeds/invasive brush into meat and milk. They
readily eat (and thrive on) pigweed, ragweed, poison ivy, dock,
sedge, black locust, autumn olive, mulberry, wild roses
(briars), blackberry brambles, honeysuckle and many other
“undesirable” plants. Some of these plants contain good
nutrient/protein levels and have greater nutrient values than
the pasture grasses. Some plants that are toxic to other animals
can be safely eaten by goats, including hemlock, poison oak,
yellow star thistle and several species of mustard. Some of the
plants that are toxic to cattle that won’t harm sheep include
leafy spurge, tall larkspur, tansy ragwort and pine needles.
Leafy spurge is becoming a huge problem in some western
regions because cattle won’t eat it and it keeps
spreading—reducing availability of desirable forage plants and
ultimately limiting the number of cattle the pasture will
support. Sheep and goats will readily eat leafy spurge, once
acclimated to it (it may take a year to overcome initial
aversion to it), and show good weight gains after they begin
consuming larger amounts. This weed has a high crude protein
level. Sheep and goats can thus convert a noxious weed into
economic gain.
Over time, keeping these plants grazed will stress and weaken
them, reducing seed production—reducing the density of
infestations to more tolerable levels. Studies have shown that
multi-species grazing can reduce leafy spurge densities by 80 to
90 percent after 3 to 5 years of grazing. Sheep and goats can
maintain control of this plant in inaccessible or
environmentally sensitive areas where herbicides can’t be used.
Using goats instead of herbicides to reduce unwanted forbs
and brush is more economical than using herbicides, more
environmentally-safe, and at the same time can produce an extra
crop from the land. They can also reduce fire danger by eating
back the brush or stripping the leaves before they dry and
produce a fire hazard. Goats can eat about 25 percent of their
body weight each day in plant matter, so this equates to a lot
of weed and brush control. They’ll clean up briars and brambles
and some of the problem weeds like musk thistles that tend to
take over more area. Standing on their hind legs, they can graze
brush up to 6 feet high, opening up some of the under-story to
let sunlight through so more grass can grow. Goats are an
inexpensive (or even profitable!) way to renovate a pasture and
improve its carrying capacity.
Sidebar
AN EXAMPLE OF DIFFERENT GRAZING BEHAVIOR AND FEED UTILIZATION –
CATTLE AND HORSES GRAZE DIFFERENTLY
Horses and ruminants are very different in the way their GI
tracts function, and selection of plants. “Horses can do better
than cattle on a high fiber, low quality forage,” says Burt
Staniar, Assistant Professor of Equine Nutrition, Pennsylvania
State University.
“This is mainly true when animals have unlimited areas to graze.
An example often given is comparing zebra and wildebeests in
Africa. The equine has a more rapid rate of food passage through
the tract; he doesn’t need to lie around and chew the cud to
reprocess feed like a ruminant does. The horse is generally less
efficient than the ruminant in extracting nutrients and energy
from feed, but makes up for this with greater intake; he is able
to eat more or less continually,” says Staniar.
Since the equine digestive tract does not get every last bit
of good out of the food eaten, horses eat more to make up for
this inefficiency. Thus they can get by on low quality forage
because of the rapid rate of passage through the gut, allowing
them to eat a lot of it, eating all day long.
By contrast, the cow can load up on feed in a shorter time
and then spends time processing it. She can’t eat as much total
feed in 24-hour period. If you put a cow and a horse in a
situation where they have only low quality forage available, the
cow will not do as well because she can only take in so much—the
amount that fills the rumen—and can’t consume any more. This is
especially true when forage quality is low (short on protein)
because a certain level of protein is needed for rumen microbes
to function properly for fermentation and fiber breakdown.
Without enough protein to “feed” the gut bugs, rumen digestion
slows and food passage is delayed—and the cow can’t eat enough
to maintain her nutrient requirements.
“The horse has the ability to keep taking in more feed. The
cow can’t meet her nutrient requirements because quality and
quantity both are too low. The horse has a more rapid rate of
passage and has more chance to still meet his requirements. In
Africa they found that the wildebeest was the first grazing
animal to move away from an area in dry seasons when feed became
limited, and the zebra could stay because he was able to
continue to utilize what was there—even if it was dry and overly
mature,” says Staniar.