current issue photo contest
contact us links
media kit subscriptions
   
the porch archives
 
Retrospective
Self-Inflicted Wounds
Society is choosing between food and grain-based fuel, losing either way.
By Wes Ishmael
A decade down the road, the size of U.S. cattle and beef industries, how they operate, how many they feed will likely have been determined by 2008, more or less, and the policies aimed at arming or disarming input costs. Right now, it’s all about corn, oil and growing demand for them even as prices continue a rocket-ride upward.

“The mandate by Congress to utilize a key food ingredient as the dominant input for bio-fuels has inextricably coupled food to fuel prices, driving up costs for consumers and affecting the economy, said AMI President and CEO J. Patrick Boyle in testimony submitted to the House Energy and Commerce Committee Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality in May.  “Valuing food for its energy content instead of nutrition is adding unnecessary inflationary pressure on the U.S. economy.”

In addressing a June gathering of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Andy Groseta, an Arizona cattle producer and president of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) explained, “NCBA feels that it is time to level the playing field and allow market forces rather than government intervention to guide the production and use of ethanol.”

Though more than the Renewable Fuels Policy (RFA) is contributing to tight supply and high prices for feed grains, NCBA emphasized at the time that more than 25% of the 2007 corn crop was required to meet ethanol production mandates. Between fewer corn acres this year, and the ravages of weather so far, the percentage of the 2008 corn crop required for ethanol grows dramatically.

“Cattlemen are now looking straight down the barrel of $7 corn, and that may just be the beginning,” said Gregg Doud, NCBA chief economist. “We already saw a lot of acres migrating away from corn this year, and that was before the wet spring pushed into June. By the time conditions improve in many of these fields, planting corn will no longer be an option.”
Groseta summed up, “Many cattle feeders are currently losing about $150 per animal. With 525,000 head of steers and heifers going to market each week, that amounts to an average weekly industry loss of approximately $79 million. These losses will be passed on to the foundation of our industry, the cow/calf producer.  For every $1 per bushel increase in the price of corn, a cattle feeder must pay $22 per hundred-weight less for a 550 lb. feeder steer…

“Cattle producers have always depended on the free market to drive their business, and as long as cattle producers have the ability to compete on a level playing field with the ethanol industry for each bushel of corn, the U.S. beef industry can and will remain competitive.”

Tipping Point Out There, Somewhere
Groseta and Doud made their comments the same week that historic Midwest flooding had some of the nation’s most productive corn ground under water. Just ahead of the flooding, the World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates had already trimmed 5 bushels per acre from this year’s estimated crop because of later planting and slow plant emergence conditions related to abnormally wet and cool weather in the Corn Belt. All futures contracts for corn through September of 2009 were trading for more than $7 per bushel.

At the time, analysts with the Agricultural Marketing Service explained, “Insurmountable pressure from the relentless surge in corn prices has finally broken the feeder cattle market rally, even though available numbers are tight and expected to become progressively more scarce. Spiking oil and corn prices have crippled the economy and crushed consumer confidence, while fear has set in as we have no way of knowing how high prices can go as market indicators show no signs of grain/fuel prices weakening.” 

Painting with a broader brush, a Spring report from the USDA Economic Research Service (ERS) concluded: “World market prices for major food commodities such as grains and vegetable oils have risen sharply to historic highs of more than 60 percent above levels just 2 years ago. Many factors have contributed to the run-up in food commodity prices. Some factors reflect trends of slower growth in production and more rapid growth in demand that have contributed to a tightening of world balances of grains and oilseeds over the last decade. Recent factors that have further tightened world markets include increased global demand for bio-fuels feed-stocks and adverse weather conditions in 2006 and 2007 in some major grain and oilseed-producing areas. Other factors that have added to global food commodity price inflation include the declining value of the U.S. dollar, rising energy prices, increasing agricultural costs of production, growing foreign exchange holdings by major food-importing countries, and policies adopted recently by some exporting and importing countries to mitigate their own food price inflation.”

Do Good versus Feel Good
“We need to assess the corn-based ethanol mandate and its unintended effects on food prices for American consumers,” said Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) in April. “When we passed the ethanol mandate, the EPA was given the authority to waive the mandate or make necessary adjustments to prevent collateral damage. With the price of everyday meat, chicken, bread, and eggs rapidly increasing, we are asking the EPA to use the flexibility that Congress gave them because so many families cannot afford the increasing prices at the grocery store.”

Hutchison, Chairman of the Republican Policy Committee, and Senator John McCain (R-AZ), sent a letter (also signed by 22 other Senators) to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Stephen Johnson about the status of regulations for states applying for an ethanol mandate waiver and urged that EPA take into consideration food inflation concerns.
“Every time hardworking American families buy groceries, they feel the financial sting of misguided federal policies mandating that taxpayers support ethanol,” said McCain. “It isn’t a surprise that food prices are rising when more than 25 percent of the corn grown today is taken out of the food supply and instead used for subsidized ethanol production. This subsidized program - paid for with taxpayer dollars - has contributed to pain at the cash register, at the dining room table, and a devastating food crisis throughout the world. We need to put an end to flawed government policies that distort the markets, raise food prices artificially, and pit producers against consumers. We must call on the EPA to exercise its authority to not exacerbate this already bad situation.”

A week earlier, Texas Governor Rick Perry asked the federal government for a 50% waiver from the federal renewable fuel standard (RFS) mandate for ethanol produced from grain. He pointed out corn prices rose 138% percent globally over the last three years and global food prices increased 83% percent over the same time period. With the implementation of the new RFS mandate, some estimates predict corn prices will rise to $8.00/bushel for the 2008 crop.

For perspective, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 increased the ethanol mandate to 15 billion gallons of corn and 1 billion gallons of bio-diesel by 2015 and 36 billion gallons by 2022. Congress gave the EPA the authority to waive the mandates or structure them differently if the mandate resulted in adverse unintended effects.

“We appreciate the good intentions behind the push for renewable fuels. In fact we’re diversifying our state’s energy portfolio at a rapid rate, but this misguided mandate is significantly affecting Texans’ family food bill,” said Perry. “There are multiple factors contributing to our skyrocketing grocery prices, but a waiver of RFS levels is the best, quickest way to reduce those costs before permanent damage is done.”

Hutchison pointed out that according to the World Agricultural Supply and Demand report, U.S. wheat stocks are at 60 year lows and soybean stocks at their lowest levels since 2003. Corn ending stocks relative to expected use, even with last year’s record crop, are below the established 25 year average. Since February 2006, the price of corn, wheat and soybeans has increased by more than 200%. In 2007 ethanol production reached 6.5 billion gallons and the federal mandate for production this year is nine billion gallons.

Groseta urged the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee to carefully weigh current market conditions as they debated several legislative proposals introduced to freeze or reduce ethanol production mandates, and to reduce or eliminate incentives that divert feed grains toward ethanol production.

In his comments to the House Energy and Commerce Committee Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality, Boyle said that the goal of energy security is commendable and should be considered in relative context to risk posed to domestic and international food security. 
“Congressional and Administration leaders should develop and implement a plan to decouple the increasing price correlation of food from fuel,” said Boyle.  He noted that, in 2007, livestock and poultry producers saw their feed prices rise by more than 65% and were anticipating an equally difficult environment for 2008.  “Food to fuel mandates and subsidies have had a profound impact on the meat and poultry industry and its ability to source affordable feed,” he added.

Boyle pointed out that the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), its predecessor —  the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAC), and existing bio-fuel subsidies and trade protections have concentrated the adverse impacts on animal agriculture producers and consumers’ food budgets.  “When the EPAC was signed, food inflation was coincidently at its ten-year average of 2.3 percent.  In January 2008, the CPI food index was 4.9 percent, which is more than twice the ten-year average.  Food inflation creates a drag on the economy and reduces the purchasing power of consumers,” Boyle noted.   He pointed out that the consequences of this added inflation contributes to an increased food bill of nearly $200 for a household of four.

Answers to these key questions and their role in directing the expansion or contraction of the beef industry are what we’ll be talking about in the 2018 retrospective.

Bookmark and Share            

RETURN TO PREVIOUS PAGE

Site Design By EDJE Technologies
  
Log-In To Admin  |  Visit
EDJE Cattle

 
CONTACT | MEDIA KIT | CURRENT ISSUE | PHOTO CONTEST | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVES | LINKS | THE PORCH