Take Our Reader Satisfaction Survey
Get your free Western Cowman
10th anniversary hat by taking this survey!

 

 

   
 
Pacer Awards - Changing The Guard
Either way, the next administration will have little agriculture experience.
By Wes Ishmael
“We’re viewing this as one of the most—if not the most—important presidential elections in the history of modern agriculture,” says Colin Woodall, Executive Director of Legislative Affairs for the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA). “This is a watershed moment for agriculture because neither presidential candidate has any direct ties to agriculture.”
Early testament to this reality is that no one inside the Washington Beltway has a clue of who might emerge as Agriculture Secretary, whether John McCain or Barack Obama is elected the next president of the United States.

The growing distance between livestock producers and the Congressional leadership representing them is nothing new. Woodall points out there are only a handful of truly rural congressional districts left. But the fact there’s been so little interaction between these presidential candidates and agriculture suggests, as Woodall does, that we’re entering a new era of policy making where the leaders have no relationship, let alone experience, with what makes the livestock industry tick.

Whoever begins bunking at the White House next January, Woodall expects them to have more zest for new regulations than President Bush.

As of the middle of June, most polls indicated it was pretty much of a coin-toss between McCain and Obama.

Key Issues
Though there’s an endless number of legislative and policy issues that will impact the beef cattle industry as the next U.S. President takes the reins, Woodall boils the focus down to three key issues: renewable fuels, environmental policy and animal rights activists.
By now, every cattle producer understands the havoc wrought by a renewable fuels policy that welds food and energy together as one via federally mandated and subsidized grain-based ethanol production.

“We understand the need for this nation to be more energy independent, but not at the expense of an entire industry, that industry being cattle,” says Woodall. He reminds that President Bush is the one who signed the Renewable Fuels Act, yet he’s considered by many to be the most cattle-friendly president in modern times.

In terms of environmental issues, Woodall says, “We have a feeling that we’ll see more liberal environmental policy, regardless of which candidate is elected.” In other words environmental policy under the next presidency will likely be more like that of the Clinton era than either of the Bushes.

It’s not like environmental issues are easy, even in the best of times. Woodall points to the Environmental Protection Agency Superfund Laws currently being used by attorney generals in some states to sue cattle producers to repair watersheds that the producers played no part in impairing.

“We need the administration to understand that yes clean air and water are important, but so is a healthy beef cattle industry,” says Woodall. “Our industry plays a vital role in this nation’s ability to maintain clean air and clean water.”

Then there are the animal rights activist and their organizations like the Humane Society (HSUS) of the United States that make no secret of their ultimate goal to ban animal agriculture production in the United States, period.

“Senator Obama has aligned himself with HSUS on more than one occasion,” notes Woodall.

Close behind these issues, Woodall points to international trade policy. He explains, “Our cattle producers in the U.S. don’t receive the government subsidies that producers in some other countries receive. We know that trade is the name of the game for us to maintain what we have and to grow what we have.”

NCBA has not endorsed a presidential candidate. However, Woodall says, “We’re encouraging our members to learn where each of the presidential candidates stands on these issues.”

Good Luck.

A visit to both candidates’ campaign websites reveal little about their thinking on agricultural issues. Obama supports banning packers from owning livestock ahead of slaughter. Best as we can tell, McCain voted against it a year or so ago. Neither candidate submitted a vote either way on the recently passed Farm Bill. Obama’s site says he’ll promote regional food systems and raise the minimum wage. McCain’s mentions a common sense approach to environmental policy and his opposition to ethanol subsidies.

Again, good luck.

Click here to email this page to a friend.

RETURN TO PREVIOUS PAGE

Site Design By EDJE Technologies
  
Log-In To Admin  |  Visit
EDJE Cattle

 
CONTACT | MEDIA KIT | CURRENT ISSUE | PHOTO CONTEST | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVES | LINKS | THE PORCH