Temple Grandin, The Cow Whisperer
Autism Led to a Career in Revolutionizing Livestock Handling
By Heather Smith Thomas
Temple Grandin, PhD (Assistant Professor of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University) is one of the world’s foremost authorities on livestock facility design and humane livestock handling. The most unusual thing about her accomplishments is that she is autistic, the victim of a developmental brain disorder. Autism affects areas of the brain that are involved in abstract thought, language and social interactions.

Born in 1947 in Boston, Massachusetts, her father was a real estate agent and her mother a writer, singer and actress. Temple did not talk until she was 3 ˝ years old and she vocalized her frustrations by screaming, chirping or humming. She displayed the classic symptoms of her condition; she didn’t want to be held or touched, and was prone to burst into raging temper tantrums when provoked.

In 1950 her parents were told she was autistic and brain damaged and should be institutionalized. They refused to take that route, however, and her mother devoted her time to improving Temple’s life—enrolling her in a course of speech therapy and reading to her continually at home. The family hired a caregiver to play with Temple and keep her from retreating into a corner. When she was old enough for school, her parents found private schools with sympathetic staff, people who could work with the child’s special needs.

Temple now credits this early intervention with pulling her out of her shell of isolation.
As a child, she had panic attacks and was obsessed with anything that rotated or whirred, but was soothed by doors. She spent a summer during her teenage years at her aunt’s cattle ranch in the West, and this changed her life’s course. She was fascinated by the squeeze chute in the corral, and climbed into it. She found it had a soothing effect on her nervousness. After she went home, she built her own squeeze chute in her bedroom—an early version of what would later be used in many schools and treatment centers for autistic children. Her summer on the ranch also helped her sense that animals and autistic people both rely on visual clues. She thinks in pictures, rather than words, and this helped her to understand the way animals see and react to their environment.

After high school, she graduated with honors from Franklin Pierce College in New Hampshire in 1970. Medical professionals discouraged her from using the homemade squeeze chute, and didn’t understand the things she was trying to learn, but eventually she found a mentor who recognized her abilities and interests. That teacher suggested she try to learn why the squeeze chute worked for her, by studying science. She entered graduate school in animal science at Arizona State University to get her masters degree and began working with the cattle industry. Later she earned a doctors degree from University of Illinois.

She worked for more than 20 years in agricultural industry before becoming a lecturer and professor of animal science at Colorado State University. She was livestock editor of the Arizona Farmer Ranchman for 5 years during the 1970’s, and became an equipment designer for Corral Industries in Phoenix, Arizona in 1974. She recognized that cattle, like autistic humans, experience stress and anxiety when confronted by certain sights and sounds, so she redesigned the typical chute for slaughterhouses.

After working for that company, Grandin realized she had poor communication skills; she was often blunt--which alienated her coworkers. She decided she would be better working on her own, and founded her own equipment and consulting business (Grandin Livestock Handling Systems) in 1975.

Her ideas were met with skepticism from the livestock industry at first, but meat processing plants quickly realized that cattle hesitated less in chutes of her design, and plant efficiency improved. Grandin’s recommendations for improving conditions for hog slaughter (housing them in less crowded conditions--and keeping them cool by hosing them down if necessary—before slaughter) resulted in lower stress levels and better meat quality. In pork, high stress prior to slaughter leads to meat classified as PSE (pale, soft, exudative—“oozing”). Her improved conditions for cattle led to reduced levels of glycogen in the muscles (affecting the pH balance of the meat) and hence a reduction in “dark cutters”.

Her autism, which was originally considered an impairment, became an asset in her life work. Her inner understanding and empathy for how animals perceive their world, react and cope with it enabled her to improve the way we handle them. Autism helps her to see things as animals do, and has given her a unique perspective.

She has also helped further our knowledge about autism, and is now a prominent speaker and author on this subject. She told her personal story in her book “Emergence: Labeled Autistic” (published in 1986), which stunned the world. Up until then most professionals and parents assumed that autistic children could never achieve a productive life and that it was impossible to modify and control the characteristics of autism. This book was released again 10 years later when she was becoming prominent in her field of livestock handling

Helping the Livestock Industry
Today Grandin is an associate professor of animal science at Colorado State University. Her writings about cattle handling, flight zone and principles of grazing behavior have helped many stockmen reduce stress on their animals, and her cattle facilities and curved chute designs are used worldwide. She has developed objective scoring systems for assessing livestock handling and more humane slaughter systems.

Her many areas of research include cattle temperament, reducing dark cutters, effective stunning methods at meat plants, genetics and behavior of domestic animals, safe handling of cattle and horses, and safe/humane restraint. She teaches courses on livestock behavior and facility design and consults with the livestock industry on design, handling and animal welfare. Today many stockmen use her livestock handling facility designs and more than half the cattle in the US are processed at packing plants using a restraining system and innovations that she developed, that comply with the humane-handling guidelines she wrote for the American Meat Institute. She credits her developmental brain disorder for her success as a scientist and her innovations in livestock facilities.

“When I first started working on these things back in the early 1970’s, people thought I was crazy. One of the first things I noticed was that cattle would go through some facilities very readily and in other facilities were balking. I would get down in the chute and realize that they were seeing shadows, or looking directly into the sun, or there was a coat on the fence or a chain hanging down, or something else distracting them,” says Grandin. The people working cattle were not taking these things into consideration. Cattle notice small visual details that most people fail to notice.

“I began designing facilities, and did some of my first ones in 1974 and 1976. One reason I wanted to make the chutes curved is because then when the cattle are entering the chute they can’t see all the people and commotion down at the other end. Also, cattle have a tendency to try to go back the way they came from. A curved chute takes advantage of that tendency,” she says.

During the past 3 decades her facility designs have become standard for many livestock feed yards. “A lot of people ask me why my curved layouts are so spread out and big. Chutes don’t work very well if you jam cattle up too tightly,” she explains.

“There are a lot of curved facilities out there that don’t work, and the reason why they don’t work is because the cattle are jammed in too tight and the corners are too sharp, or they dead end at the squeeze chute. One thing that’s very important is that as an animal is standing in the crowding pen, looking up the curved chute, he must see that there’s a place to go. If it dead-ends at the squeeze chute, and that’s what he sees, that’s the worst mistake you can make. Also you want to lay out a round crowd pen so the cattle are coming around the bend, and you can use their inclination to want to go back where they came from,” she says.

Low Stress Handling
She also stresses the fact that people need to stay calm when handling cattle. “A calm animal is always easier to handle than a scared, excited one. When we can get people to calm down, stop screaming and yelling, and stop using electric prods, cattle can be worked easier. People should not be carrying electric prods around. Those should only be picked up if an animal absolutely refuses to go into the squeeze chute. Another tip is to only fill the crowd pen half full,” says Grandin.

“I always want people to measure their handling. So often I’ve gone out and worked with people and they get their handling really nice, and I come back a year later and they’ve reverted back to their old rough ways. I call that bad becoming normal. The only way to prevent that is to measure handling. If you put 100 cattle through the chute, how many fell down? It shouldn’t be more than 1 percent--otherwise you have a slippery floor or are getting them too excited. How many cattle ran into something like a gate or a fence? How many did you use your electric prod on? How many cattle are bawling when you catch them in the squeeze chute? If they are bawling, you are either hurting them or they are very upset.

Obviously, if you are branding them they are going to bawl. But otherwise, you should be able to bring them up the single file alley and catch them in the squeeze chute without any vocalization or direct response to the squeeze chute or prod. You can measure this.” If you keep track of these things and put a number on it, you can tell if your handling is improving or reverting back to bad.

“One of my biggest frustrations has been to teach people how to do it correctly and then have them slip backward. About 20 percent of people learn it well and can keep their handling methods good, but most of them lapse back gradually, and it can be so gradual they don’t realize its happening. So you have to keep track,” she says.

“Another thing is that you want cattle to exit the chute walking or trotting. How many went faster? I call those speeders. How many speeders did you have, coming out of the squeeze chute? The simplest way to measure exit speed is by whether they are walking or trotting versus running or jumping. You can easily count how many speeders you had. I want most of them at a walk or a trot, and I want that measured. This is what I’m most adamant about now; I want handling measured, with people keeping track of it with numbers. Then they can tell if their handling is getting better or worse,” she says. This is the only way to monitor handling, except for the people who really want to learn stockmanship and take it seriously, focusing on it all the time.

“Most people are not willing to take time to learn the fine points of stockmanship. But if people get the animals scared and excited, it takes 20 minutes or longer for those animals to calm down. It would save time to go slowly, and not get them all scared and excited,” she says.

“Some people are such good stockmen that they don’t need good corrals, but a good facility helps, and also helps keep people from getting hurt. Safety is another reason to have a good design. Many people get hurt by cattle, if they get the cattle excited,” she says.

Train the Cattle to Get Them Used to Different Things
Another thing people don’t always understand is that cattle differentiate between a person on a horse and a person on the ground. It’s very important that cattle learn how to work with both. “There’s nothing worse than cattle coming into a meat packing plant with no prior experience of people on foot. I have seen this, where even at the feedyard everything was done on horseback — even bringing them into the vaccinating chute area. Then when cattle go to the packing plant they freak out when they see people on foot, and it can be very dangerous,” says Grandin.

Some of the wildest cattle she’s ever encountered at a slaughter plant were some that had never been handled on foot. In checking the background on those cattle, she found they had come from a feedlot where all the handling was very calm and low-stress but it was all done on horseback—even when moving them into a chute for vaccinations.

To ensure that cattle are easy to handle both horseback and on foot, they need some experience with both. Cattle are sensory-based thinkers; information is stored in their brain as specific pictures and they see a person on foot and a person on a horse as two totally different things. If they are used to one, they feel safe and relaxed. But anything new and different is immediately frightening. They must be carefully and quietly introduced to new experiences before they leave the ranch or feedlot.

To work cattle with horses, on foot, or with dogs, they need to be trained to work that way. Cattle that have never been worked with dogs can also be dangerous and unmanageable. Cows tend to become extremely agitated and usually try to chase the dog, viewing it as a predator to be driven away from their calves. Even the cattle that are used to being herded with dogs can become more wild and dangerous if you try to handle them in confined areas (like a crowding pen, sorting alley or chute) with dogs.

Grandin says that some of the dangerous behavior she’s seen in cattle from certain feedlots includes kicking at people when confined in close quarters. These were cattle that had been worked with dogs. A dog biting at cattle that can’t get away will cause the cattle to kick –sometimes lashing out with both hind feet. Using dogs inappropriately just teaches cattle to kick and they may then kick at a human when similarly confined.

The secret to having calm, unstressed, easy-to-handle cattle involves thinking like they do. This includes working with them instead of against them, understanding the way they view the world around them, and getting them used to new experiences gradually and quietly. It also means treating them with understanding and respect. Grandin’s efforts at educating people, giving stockmen a better look into animal thought/emotions, has helped improve stock handling on many farms, ranches, feedlots and packing plants.

Grandin’s Contributions to Understanding Animals and Autism
In her career with the livestock industry, Grandin has written numerous articles, book chapters and technical papers on animal handling, and 45 scientific papers for journals. She has also tried to help people understand the bond we have with animals, and the way animals think. Two of her 7 books have been on the New York Times bestseller lists. One of her recent books is “Animals Make Us Human”.

Her book “Animals in Translation: Using the Mysteries of Autism to Decode Animal Behavior” was dictated to her co-author by telephone, and published in 2005. In it she states that people were animals once, and when we became human beings we gave something up. She says that being close to animals brings some of it back.

Even though her passion is animal science and humane treatment of animals, she is also very involved with helping educate people about autism. Many children have milder forms of this disorder and she wants to help make sure these children can be helped to develop to their potential

Another book, “Thinking in Pictures and Other Reports from My Life with Autism” included a foreward written by the eminent neurologist Oliver Sacks. He also wrote a book about Grandin’s incredible achievements, titled “An Anthropologist on Mars”. With co-author Kate Duffy, Grandin wrote “Developing Talents: Careers for Individuals with Asperger Syndrome and High-Functioning Autism”. She lectures frequently on autism and urges people to view the condition in a different light. She says, “We’ve got to have a lot more emphasis on the talent, and not so much emphasis on the disability.”

THINKING IN PICTURES
UNDERSTANDING AN ANIMAL’S BRAIN

In late October 2009, Grandin was the keynote speaker at Missouri State University College of Veterinary Medicine’s Human-Animal Bond lecture series. She told her audience that she, being autistic, is a total visual thinker. Animals’ thinking is also sensory based. “Their memories are going to be in pictures, smells and sounds. They are very sensitive to tone of voice. There’s a whole world of cognition without having language,” said Grandin.

She said that animals’ emotional systems are very capable of fear, rage, curiosity, separation anxiety and most of the feelings we humans experience. These emotions have been studied and mapped in neuroscience but have not been studied in veterinary medicine; what is known in one scientific field has not been discovered or applied in another.

“Neuroscience has its journals. Veterinary and animal behavior sciences have theirs, and people usually don’t cross disciplines—but I have always tried to,” said Grandin. All too often one scientific field is not aware of the findings of another. And the animal science profession (and stock raisers) are generally not aware of any of these studies and papers.

During Grandin’s graduate work in animal science (earning her doctorate from University of Illinois) she took neuroscience classes and began reading neuroscience journals extensively. The studies that were published in this field were of great interest to her because she realized she had special insight into animals’ emotions and thinking.

“If you don’t have a verbal language, the only other way the brain can store information is in sensory-based ways. There is no other way. People with autism process information in the primary visual cortex. When I access my memory, I go into the graphics files, which in most people are hidden under the language,” explained Grandin. There is clinical evidence that this is the way animals think.

“The brain makes file folders and puts sensory-based information in them. In a normal human, language covers up the more sensory parts of the brain. I don’t think with the language parts of the brain. The desktop is language. Underneath is the visual, sensory-based part.”

Note: for Temple Grandin’s facility designs and other cattle handling information, look at her website: www.grandin.com - She also has videos on YouTube. One of those describes the right and wrong way to lay out handling facilities. She has written several books including her recent “Humane Livestock Handling” (2008), “Thinking in Pictures,” “Animals in Translation” (which was a New York Times best seller), her textbook “Livestock Handling and Transport,” and her current best seller “The Way I See It: A Personal Look at Autism and Aspbergers.” An HBO movie about Temple Grandin’s life, and the amazing influence she’s had in changing the way people view animal handling and autism, will be coming out in February.
 

Bookmark and Share            

RETURN TO PREVIOUS PAGE

Site Design By EDJE Technologies
  
Log-In To Admin  |  Visit
EDJE Cattle

 
CONTACT | MEDIA KIT | CURRENT ISSUE | PHOTO CONTEST | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVES | LINKS | THE PORCH